We are presenting
the original letters in re-typed form to speed
download time. The actual documents can each be
downloaded for viewing, if desired.
The following is a
rundown of correspondence we have had with New
York State and others, over the last two and a
half years. ~ From the time our I.S.T.E.A.
funding was given to us until the State decided
to steal it back. ~ It also includes letters
from other dates that are germain to the
on-going situation.
Note that we are dealing with Officials of the
State of New York.
See New York
State's overall disdain for ethics and fairness.
~ The greed which brings them to ignore proper
conduct in favor of smash and grab and making
rules to suit themselves. ~ It is a very sick
situation. ~ It is happening to us. ~ It is
certainly out there, affecting many of you who
read this, in other ways and means.
From:
John C. Egan
Commissioner
State of New York Department of Transportation.
Albany NY 12232
December 8, 1994
To:
Mr. Floyd E. Baker
The S. S. Canadiana Preservation Society, Knc.
17 Delray Drive
Cheektowaga NY 14225-1619
Dear Mr. Baker:
Congratulations!
I am happy to inform you that the Department's
Upstate Transportation Enhancement Advisory
committee has selected your project, S. S.
Canadiana Preservation & Restoration Project,
for funding through the Transportation
Enhancements Program of the Intermodal Surface
Transportation Enhancement Act (ISTEA).
Transportation
Enhancements funds provide an opportunity to
accomplish non-traditional projects that will
enhance the quality of life in their community.
~ You project is one of thirty-three outstanding
projects that have been selected to receive
funding from the over 100 eligible projects
submitted. ~ The total Federal Funds allocated
for this project is $400,000.00.
Our Regional Transportation Enhancements
Coordinator will be in contact with you shortly
to discuss the Project Development process.
Sincerely,
(signed) John Egan
John C. Egan
cc: Kevin Greiner
Mayor Tells State He Is Dumping Canadiana
Sponsorship.
He wants to steal our money for street lights
Commissioner John B. Daly
New York State Department of Transportation
1220 Washington Avenue
Albany, New York 12282
Subject: City of Buffalo Street Lighting Grant.
[note: there is no such animal.]
Dear Commissioner Daly: [slashed out and
replaced with "John"]
Again I take this opportunity to congratulate
you on your recent appointment as Commissioner
and I hope that your first 100 days were
successful and fruitful.
However, I do have a rather unusual problem in
that the only City of Buffalo request for
enhancement funds that was approved was for the
hull restoration for the Canadiana. ~ I hereby
advise that the City does not accept this grant
[it's not a grant but they don't know that.] and
I ask for your indulgence to transfer these
grant funds to the Main Street Mall Project (two
applications are attached, additional copies are
available if required).
The re-lighting of the Main Street Mall is of
larger importance to the City of Buffalo and on
a scale from one to ten the lighting is a "ten"
versus the Canadiana as a "one".
In conclusion, although I realize that this an
unusual request, I respectfully ask for your
indulgence and approval to transfer these funds
to a very worthwhile project.
Sincerely,
[signed] Tony
Anthony M. Masiello
Mayor
AMM/sa
cc: Robert J. Russell, P.E., Regional Director,
NYSDOT
Steward Hunt, Chairman, Buffalo Place
Commissioner Joseph N. Giambra, Dept. of Public
Works
David F. Jaros, P.E., City Engineer, Divn. of
Engineering
Sam Puglise [Canadiana contact man.]
We have to hand it
to them; their repeated use of the word
"indulgence" was totally appropriate. ~ Also,
their counting system is really "cute".
We're a charitable, educational, not-for-profit,
501(c)(3) organization and the Mayor was trying
to rip us off. ~ Their street lighting
application ended up sixth from the bottom of
one hundred and seven applicants. ~ The
Canadiana was at or near the top. ~ No
application below the 32nd level in the review
board point system received any funding at all.
~ Yet the Mayor thought the State would just
slip our money over to him, like it was his.
~ Like they say, "lottery" wise, "Hey..; you
never know.". ~ But they certainly wouldn't
do it. ~ They knew better. ~ There were sixty
eight higher ranking municipal applications that
would have had a slight problem with that. ~ But
hey; you don't lose anything but respect, for
trying.
State of New York
Department Of Transportation
Albany, NY 12232
Mr Floyd E. Baker
President
The S. S. Canadiana Preservation Society, Inc.
17 Delray Drive
Cheektowaga NY, 14225-1619
Dear Mr Baker:
This is in response to your letter in which you
expressed concern of the potential movement of
the ISTEA Enhancement Funding to another project
that was also a candidate for funding last year,
but was not selected.
As you know, the Transportation Enhancement
Advisory Committees have been given the task of
reviewing all projects and selecting the best of
them for consideration of funding. ~ The
Department will continue the existing practice
of allowing the Advisory Committees to pick the
best projects. ~ The Canadiana Project was
previously determined to be worthy of funding
under the program, and I do not intend to change
that determination at this time. ~ However, the
funding set aside for any project where the
project does not proceed in a timely manner as
outlined in the project application application,
could be put back into the funding pot to be
redistributed during future review cycles.
As you know, projects must have sponsorship in
order for them to proceed. ~ Sponsors must be
willing to sign an agreement with the State
committing to the project and recognizing that
with sponsorship comes several responsibilities
as outlined in the project agreement. ~ Assuming
that you will still have a sponsor and be ready
to proceed with your project within a reasonable
time, the project can and will continue under
the same arrangements.
Sincerely,
(Original signed by John B. Daly)
John B. Daly
Commissioner
His mention of needing "sponsorship" comes
between the times when Anthony Masiello reneged
on his agreement and when it was re-established
by the members of the Common Council.
Room 502 - City Hall
- Buffalo, New York - 14202 - Phone 851-5636
Anthony M Masiello
Mayor
To:
Robert J. Russell, P.E.
Regional Director
State of New York
Department of Transportation
125 Main Street.
Buffalo, New York 14203
Subject:
Executed Agreements for Transportation
Enhancement Projects
S. S. Canadiana Preservation & Restoration
Project.
Dear Sir:
In response to your memo of March 18, 1996,
kindly be advised that the City of Buffalo has
come to terms with the Canadiana Restoration
Committee and as per the attached resolution, we
will begin the agreement process. ~ I estimate
that the agreement will be processed by the City
of Buffalo within four (4) weeks and submitted
to you for review and approval. ~ Assuming a
turn-around of approximately four (4) weeks by
the New York State Department of Transportation,
the City of Buffalo can then forward the
agreement to the Common Council for
implementation.
Mr. Kurt Felgemacher of your staff attended a
meeting with my staff on Monday, April 8th, to
review and begin the process. ~ If you have any
questions, please contact David F. Jaros, P.E.,
City Engineer, at 851-5631 concerning this
project.
Very truly yours,
(Original signed by Joseph N. Giambra
Joseph N. Giambra
Commissioner
Department of Public Works
JNG/DFJ/SCP:cam
Attachment
cc:
Joel A. Giambra, Comptroller
Edward Peach, Corporation Council
Floyd E. Baker
It took six months of making appointments and
attending committee meetings to bring this
about. ~ In that time, we talked with 10 of the
13 council members to explain all that the
Canadiana could accomplish and do for the City
of Buffalo and its people. ~ When the vote came,
the 10 we had talked with, voted to restore; the
three who didn't, voted against it.
State of New York
Department of Transportation
125 Main Street
Buffalo NY, 14203
October 3, 1996
Hon. Anthony M. Masiello, Mayor
City of Buffalo
Office of the Mayor
City Hall
Buffalo NY 14202
Re: S. S. Canadiana, PIN 5754.75 City of
Buffalo, Erie County.
Dear Mayor Masiello:
This letter is in regard to the eligibility of
the referenced project for the Transportation
Enhancement Program (TEP).
Attached is a July 17, 1990 letter from the
State Historic Preservation Officer which
indicates that the S. S. Canadiana is not
eligible for inclusion on the National Register
of Historic Places. ~ The S. S. Canadiana was
selected by the TEP Advisory Committee based on
it qualifying for the Register. ~ Since the
project does not meet this criteria, we must
regretfully remove this project from the
Transportation Enhancement Program.
The S. S. Canadiana awarded Federal funds will
revert back to the Upstate Region's funded
allotment. ~ They then will be re-awarded based
on the priority listing developed from those
eligible projects not funded from the third TEP
round.
Should you have any questions, please feel free
to call me at (716) 847-3238.
Very truly yours,
Original signed by Robert J. Russell
Robert J. Russell, P.E.
Regional Director
RJR/KF/lls
Attach.
cc:
Edward H. Small, Jr., Staff Director, NFTC
Floyd Baker, S. S. Canadiana Preservation
Society
We gave them
the July 1990 letter, mentioned above, in order
to release the State Historic Parks Office, "SHPO",
from responsibility and to proceed.
What they are not saying is just not true. The
the award was not predicated upon our being
eligible for the National Historic Register. ~
The members of the NYS ISTEA Review Board
knew there was no such requirement. ~ It was
their job to study the qualifications of the
applicants and they gave the Canadiana
the money!! ~ Read the rules yourself; they
are printed below. ~ There was no such
requirement in the I.S.T.E.A. Handbook nor
elsewhere. ~ The D.O.T. made it up to prevent
any community organizations, non profit groups,
etc. from having access to their money;
in opposition to ISTEA's intentions.
Please see the third paragraph of their
letter. ~ They state they will take the
money from the Canadiana, which was near
the top on the first application to ISTEA, and
give it to project(s) that have so little value,
that they were still not funded after three
ISTEA rounds. ~ That is not a real intelligent
use of taxpayer money. ~ Someone is wrong here;
and it isn't us.
The Handbook clearly indicates that "historic"
projects must be proven to be NOT on the
Register, before they can continue, unimpeded by
SHPO. ~ This is what the letter was for.
~ We were proving we were NOT on the Register. ~
Below is the wording relating to "historic"
projects, that was put forth in the I.S.T.E.A.
Handbook and to which the Review Board and all
Applicants adhered.
NY State Historic Preservation Office
Requirements
Implementation of a transportation enhancement
project may affect structures or sites with
historic significance. ~ The agreement
recognizes this and says that the sponsor is
responsible for resolving such concerns.
Protection of historic and archaeological
resources must be considered during project
implementation. ~ Documentation that historic
preservation requirements are met is required. ~
Consultation with the State Historic
Preservation Officer (SHPO) at OPRHP is required
if historic resources are associated with the
project. ~ Standards for historic facilities
or structures are those accepted by the SHPO for
such work. ~ FHWA requires documentation
that the federal 106 process has been adequately
addressed. ~ Once the required Section 106
documentation is received by FHWA, FHWA must
concur that all necessary provisions of Section
106 (36 CFR Part 800) have been met. ~ Another
NEPA requirement which might impact historic
preservation is Section 4(f), which applies when
a project has a "use" of a historic site.
Working through the regional project manager,
sponsors should coordinate with regional
environmental units to assess the state
environmental requirements that may be
applicable to their project. ~ The Department's
Regional Cultural Resource Coordinator and Main
Office Environmental Analysis Bureau may provide
guidance.
At least three TEP activities directly involve
historic preservation. ~ The process to
advance them is the same as to advance projects
without a historic preservation
component; the sponsor finds out if the
project involves an historic property. ~ The
sponsor identifies resources on or eligible for
listing on the National Register of Historic
Places (NRHP); the SHPO helps in this step. ~
If historic properties are identified, the
sponsor, in direct consultation with the SHPO,
makes a good faith effort to identify potential
impacts. ~ The sponsor progresses that
project in consultation with the SHPO, for
assistance regarding historic preservation
standards. ~ The Department's Environmental
Analysis Bureau Cultural resource staff and
Cultural Resource Coordinator may provide
guidance. ~ If historic properties or impacts
are not associated with the project, further
consultation is not necessary.
These are the only requirements that
apply. ~ This copy is taken from our I.S.T.E.A.
Application Handbook, as supplied, by the D.O.T.,
at the time. ~ The Canadiana is "historic
preservation" but there is no requirement
for inclusion in the National Register. ~ It is
an item to be looked for; and if found,
SHPO would take control of the project.
The Handbook explains that the process is the
same for advancing all 10 TEP activities.
~ There are those with NO historic properties
and for them, "further consultation is not
necessary." ~ There are also those with
historic properties and, as per these
regulations; if, after "a good faith effort"
SHPO determines, by using it's own standards,
that "impacts" are not associated with the
project, further consultation is not necessary."
SHPO tells us they have no problem with
our rebuilding the Canadiana hull.
SHPO examined our situation and found there
would be "no impact". ~ Their standards are such
that they would be concerned only if a
project involved an item eligible for, or on,
the National Register. ~ To say that the only
things worth preserving are those on the
"National Register" would be insane. ~ The
truth in this matter is a far cry from
requiring everything to be on the Register.
~ The Canadiana hull restoration is therefore
O.K. to continue and the N.Y.S. D.O.T. is
apparently trying to stop it for very un-ethical
reasons of their own.
They are stealing
our money. ~ We need some help.
Documentation
Required by Section 106
(36 CFR Part 800)
Canadiana Historic
Register listing is not a factor.
SHPO is therefore relieved from "further
consultation".
New York State
Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic
Preservation
The Governor Nelson A. Rockefeller Empire State
Plaza
Agency Building 1
Albany NY 12238-0001
July 17, 1990
Mr. Robert F. Skurzewski
Vice President
Friends of the Canadiana
131 Hoerner Ave
Cheektowaga NY 14211
Re: S. S. Canadiana
Dear Mr. Skurzewski:
Thank you for your recent letter. ~ We have
thoroughly evaluated the S. S. Canadiana
proposal with staff and as a result it was
determined, that two concerns stand in the way
of processing the nomination proposal.
The first concern is the current location of the
vessel. ~ All current information including your
letter dated June 27, 1990, placed the Canadiana
in Canada where this office has no
jurisdiction....
Based on the information provided to this office
and on site inspections in 1985 and 1986 it is
the opinion of this office that the S. S.
Canadiana no longer retains sufficient integrity
of location, design, materials, workmanship or
feeling. ~ As such, it is the opinion of staff
that while the proposed rehabilitation of the
vessel is a positive step, we cannot continue
the nomination process. ~ It has been determined
that this proposal be closed and that the file
be corrected to indicate that through changes,
which occurred after our original evaluation of
the vessel (January 16, 1996), the vessel no
longer retains sufficient integrity necessary
for inclusion on the State or National Registers
of Historic Places.
Sincerely:
(Signed) David S. Gillespie
Director
Historic Preservation Field
Services Bureau.
This letter is the Federal Section 106
documentation that is required in the
Application Handbook regulations shown above. ~
This is the documentation that eliminates any
SHPO responsibility for control over our
restoration process and allows it to continue,
as stated in that same paragraph. See the last
sentence.
The
requirements at that time specifically
ALLOWED
what the state is now saying is not allowed.
THE STATE IS STEALING OUR MONEY!!
Where are our representatives in Government?
Where are those who are supposed to be looking
out for everyone.
Those who should work to prevent injustices such
as this.
Federal Highway
Administration says Canadiana is NOT required to
be on the National Historic Register to qualify
for the ISTEA award
State of New York
Department Of Transportation
Albany, NY 12232
Mr Floyd E. Baker
President
The S. S. Canadiana Preservation Society, Inc.
17 Delray Drive
Cheektowaga NY, 14225-1619
Dear Mr Baker:
This is in response
to your October 18, 1996 letter to me regarding
the Transportation Enhancement project that was
approved to restore the hull of the Canadiana
and subsequently withdrawn. ~ The decision to
withdraws the funding, as you know, was based on
a determination by the State Historic
Preservation Office, SHPO, that the Canadiana
was not eligible for inclusion in the National
Register of Historic Places. ~ Since the State's
definition of historic has always involved
eligibility for inclusion in the Register, this
project clearly no longer involved work that met
the definition of one of the ten eligible
program activities.
However, we are prepared to provide additional
time for you and the City of Buffalo to contact
representatives from SHPO and work towards
making the Canadiana eligible for the Register.
~ We will reserve the funding previously
approved until January 2, 1998. ~ If the
Canadiana becomes eligible under the SHPO
definition by that date, we will restore funding
for the Canadiana. ~ However, if SHPO determines
your project is still ineligible for the
Register by that date, we will unfortunately
have to remove the funding reserved for the
Canadiana.
Sincerely,
(signed) Robert J. Russell, P.E.
Robert J. Russell P.E.
Regional Director
cc:
Honorable Anthony M. Masiello, Mayor, City of
Buffalo
Thomas Waters, FHWA
Edward H. Small Jr. Staff Director, NFTC
We asked them to
show us where their "definition of historic" can
be found. ~ Since the State "has always" had it,
it should be easy to demonstrate and we would
just like to see it. ~ Show us something
real and we might just go away. ~ Since they
can't, they create this stonewall situation in
which we actually have to take them to court to
force their ethical, legal and proper behavior.
~ That is a hell of a situation. ~ We can read
the rules that say the Canadiana is
qualified to receive the ISTEA funds. ~ We can't
find anyone who will show us why it is not so;
as they claim>. ~ We can't even find
anyone, at any level of government, who will
tell them to do so. ~ Isn't this what they
call tyranny? ~ They are forcing us to take them
to court; to be forced into giving the Canadiana
the funds. ~ That takes time... ~ Time is the
killer. ~ They are waiting us out in the hopes
we won't be able to. ~ Then they will win. ~ And
you will lose!
Below you will find the names of the people we
have asked to look into this for us. ~ Let's see
what they can do.
The D.O.T. speaks of a determination based on
SHPO rejecting our listing. ~ Mr. Rick Lord, the
head of NYSHPO, has stated SHPO is only
interested in knowing it is NOT eligible. ~
SHPO is not making any determination that
the Canadiana should not get the money. ~ We
want to know who is!
The D.O.T. says they are going to give us time
to qualify? ~ That is simply a pathetic effort
to make themselves appear "helpful". ~ They know
we cannot possibly get on the register; nor do
we want to be there. ~ They know the boat
could not sail nor make use of the ISTEA funds
if it was on the register.
They continue that this project "clearly no
longer involved work that met the definition of
one of the ten eligible program activities". ~
That's not true either. ~ We qualified under
four of the activities, not all being
historic. ~ The State is trying to make our
neck fit their noose.
NY is
stealing our money!!
We need some help.
Who in Government is concerned about:
Tourism - Families/Children - Economic
Development
State of New
York Department Of Transportation Albany, NY
12232
Honorable
Gregory B. Olma
Erie County Legislature
1330 Broadway
Buffalo, New York 14202
Dear Mr Olma:
This is in response to your letter regarding the
Canadiana Preservation Society's Transportation
Enhancement Project.
We have recently responded to Floyd Baker at the
Canadiana Preservation Society and have attached
a copy for your information.
I trust this addresses your concerns in regard
to the Society's Enhancement project.
Sincerely,
(Signed) John B. Daly
John B. Daly
Commissioner
This is how they
answered all the Government Representatives who
asked them to explain how they can disqualify
us. ~ The letters are all the same whether they
are to members of the U.S. Senate or Congress,
the State Senate or Assembly, the County
Officials or City Officials. ~ New York State D.
O. T. is REFUSING to answer them. ~ So far, we
are not aware of any follow up to insist they
do.
They ignore the Representatives questions and
say they responded to us instead. ~ They do not
even include, at least in some cases I am aware
of, a copy of this letter that is supposed to
answer us. ~ As you can see, that letter is up
above and it answers absolutely nothing... ~
They can't! ~ They're stealing the
money from us and it seems there are some who
are ready to let them get away with it!
The Canadiana
May-Day Letter to "Everyone"
We must be saved now
or be lost forever
We are asking help
from the following:
Governor George Petaki; ~ Governor of New York
State.
Mayor Anthony E. Masiello; ~ Mayor, City of
Buffalo.
Members of the Buffalo Common Council. ~ (Thanks
for the earlier support.)
Hon. Dennis Gorski; ~ County Executive, Erie
County NY.
Members of the Erie County Legislature.
Members of the New York State Assembly. ~ (W.N.Y.)
Hon. Richard Anderson
Hon. Arthur O. Eve
Hon. Sam Hoyt
Hon. Joseph Pillitteri
Hon. Francis Pordum
Hon. Thomas M. Reynolds
Hon. Robin Schimminger
Hon. Paul Tokaz
Hon. Sandra Lee Worth
Members of the New York Senate. ~ (W.N.Y.)
Senator George Maziarz
Senator Anthony Nanula
Senator Mary Lou Rath
Senator William Stackowski
Senator Dale Volker
Members of the United States Congress. ~ (W.N.Y.)
Congressman John J. LaFalce
Congressman Bill Paxon
Congressman Jack Quinn
Members of the United States Senate. ~ (W.N.Y.)
Senator Alfonse D'Amato
Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan
Mr. Howard Peaks; ~ United States Highway Administration (Washington)
Mr. Tom Waters; ~ United States Highway Administration, (New York)
Mr. John P. Daly; ~ Commissioner N.Y.S. D.O.T.
Andrew Rudnick; ~
President, Greater Buffalo Partnership.
Mr. Luke Rich; ~ Director,
Empire State Development
Ms Joan Boser; ~ Preservation Coalition,
Buffalo NY.
Mr. Jeff Wright; ~ Business First Newspaper
Mr.
Robert Rich; ~ Rich Products, Buffalo NY
Mr. Larry Quinn; ~ Buffalo
Sabers, Buffalo NY
Other specific individuals to be added.
Published on the Internet's World Wide Web at:
HTTP://WWW.WEBPAY.COM/CANADIANA.HTML
and
http://www.olm1.com/~wny/buffalo/canadiana.html
Others to be
determined.
THE WEB SITE URL'S ABOVE MAY NO
LONGER BE ACTIVE, EVERY ATTEMPT HAS BEEN MADE TO
TRANSFER ALL FILES TO THIS SITE
http://sscanadiana.com
The
Canadiana May Day letter
May 1 1997
To: (See above list)
This letter is in regards to the S. S.
Canadiana's situation with New York State and
our pending I.S.T.E.A. funding. ~ We are sending
it to all who should be concerned about their
constituents and the economic improvement of
Buffalo and Western New York. We must save this
beautiful and historically priceless passenger
steamship; the sole survivor of Buffalo's great
shipbuilding past.
This letter is being sent to the attached list
of individuals. ~ It will also be sent to other
individuals along with being made public on the
Internet; via various newsgroups and our
permanent "S. S. Canadiana Home Page".
http://sscanadiana.com/
We have been waiting to hear from you. ~ Has
everyone forgotten that we hold the key to one
of the biggest draws for public participation in
the Buffalo waterfront and downtown area? ~ I
have been told by a few, to whom this letter is
addressed, that it was not thought to be a
viable project. ~ It that the problem? ~ If so
then there is no problem. ~ They are
wrong!
It has been decided by people very qualified to
make such decisions, that the Canadiana can
succeed and is among the best possible uses
of I.S.T.E.A. funds. ~ You want facts and
figures? ~ You want experts? ~ We have them
...
We need to know now, if YOU support the S. S.
Canadiana restoration and what, if anything, you
are prepared to do to help. ~ We request a reply
within the new few weeks and by the end of May
at the latest. ~ Please do not tell us that you
must wait for others to make the first move.
The Canadiana was allocated this $400,000.00 of
I.S.T.E.A. funding because it met all the
criteria set forth by the U.S. Government and
New York State. ~ The only requirements were to
have a "sponsor" and to provide $118,000.00 as
our portion of the total cost. ~ We can now do
that! ~ Now that we are ready to move forward,
New York State is attempting to KEEP our money.
~ Because it is still in their possession? ~
That is "conversion" and that is a crime.
We have the documentation that says it is our
money. ~ That fact was determined by the review
board set up by New York State itself, and
verified in a letter to our organization, dated
December 1994 and signed by the then
Commissioner of the New York State Department of
Transportation. ~ It was further attested to by
the current Commissioner of the Department of
Transportation, in a second letter to our
organization, dated October 1995. ~ That letter
states the money was still available for our
use, with no specified time limit, and the
requirements were still only that there be a
"sponsor" and that we raise our portion of the
cost. ~ Copies of these letters have previously
been sent to all. ~ They are on the Internet
however, if you wish to read them; or we will
supply copies upon request.
In October 1996, New York State came up with a
new "rule". ~ One they are using to say the
Canadiana no longer qualifies for the money. ~
They are applying it to the Canadiana,
retroactively. ~ They are changing the rules of
the game, two years after it was played. ~ This
is not right!
We want someone to tell us where this regulation
resided at the time we were allocated the funds.
~ We have done all the checking that is possible
to do and there is no basis that we can
find. ~ We have requested specifics as to where
this was required, prior to our being given the
funding, and our questions are being ignored;
as yours have been. ~ They cannot answer you
by saying they answered us. ~ They told us
nothing to justify their current moves. We
did meet all the Federal and State requirements
at the time of our application. ~ The people who
reviewed all the applicants knew that! ~ The
N.Y.S. D.O.T. is stealing our money and we would
like each of you to whom we address this letter,
to do something about it.
The Canadian Federal Government is to fund our
$118,000.00 share of the cost.
They have been prepared to supply what is needed
so that we could meet the requirement. ~ They
are ready to pass this needed financing to Port
Colborne's Department of Economic Development
which will cover much of the labor and other
items required in the rebuilding of the
Canadiana hull. ~ The great benefits of saving
this historic ship are obvious to them
and they are standing ready to join in an
International effort to bring this grand old
ship back to operation. ~ With this petty ploy
by the State D. O. T., we are in danger of
losing the decades of wonderful opportunities
our ship would provide; to both countries.
Are you going to throw away the chance to save
this ship? ~ Canada is willing to back a major
portion of the rebuilding. ~ Our organization
provides the major thrust for covering the cost
of getting it done? ~ We have raised
approximately one and a half million dollars so
far in our efforts to restore this great ship. ~
The vast majority of it, contributions of
services and material and tremendous amounts of
volunteer labor. ~ Is that all to be wasted?
The proposed rebuild of the Buffalo waterfront
has a cost of $125,000,000.00 for starters.
~ Is this money to be spent on a gamble that
people will come to this "island of niceness"? ~
The Canadiana would certainly bring them
downtown to the waterfront; by the thousands,
every day, all day. ~ You must certainly be
aware that city planners across the country know
that large historic ships are a major
plus for any port city, to have. ~ You
have the Canadiana. ~ Are you not going to keep
that advantage? ~ Would you rather it just went
to the scrap yard? ~ What are the real
priorities here... Who's priorities are they?
We are to receive $400,000.00 from the State,
for this restoration. ~ The State that paid for
the Feasibility Study which proved that it
should be done. ~ Why would they have done that?
~ Because if you look at just the first week the
Canadiana sails, it will be running three
cruises a day. ~ At 2000 people per cruise, six
thousand a day, forty-two a week ant a measly
$10.00 ticket price. That is $420,000.00 onto
Main Street, in ticket sales alone. ~ The ISTEA
"seed" money is given back to the
taxpayer in less than a week. ~ Add parking,
food, souvenirs, etc. and you have a million
dollars, plus. ~ We know this will happen, as
will any other individual who gives it a little
thought. ~ There are hundreds of thousands of
people out there, including Canadians, who have
ridden the Canadiana in the past and will fight
to do so again. ~ When this audience is finally
satisfied, we have many other plans and methods
to continue doing good for the people of this
area and providing a major economic boost for
the city.
There are pages of benefits, uses and returns
that will flow from this ship. ~ The fund
raising it will do for other charities. ~ Its
use, given at no charge to children's
organizations; for special, handicapped and
indigent children to have a chance to sail our
beautiful lake. ~ The tourism; when our totally
unique excursions to Cleveland and Toronto cause
2000 people to rent 1000 hotel rooms here in
W.N.Y. for days prior to, and following, the
trip. ~ We can go on and on but this can all be
seen on the Canadiana's Home Page on the
Internet. ~ The slow thinkers who say it
shouldn't be done, should go back under their
rock.
Way beyond its money making capacity, there are
the human needs that will be met. ~ Millions of
children, over decades to come, would once again
be able to sail across the lake. ~ To make
contact with with their parents in ways that
would never be forgotten. ~ There is so
much good tied up in this boat, it is extremely
hard to put into words.
Thousands of people have joined in and worked on
this project over the years. ~ People who have
invested so much energy and hope. ~ Those who
have forsaken their own interests. ~ Those who
have worked and lived to sail again on the
Canadiana but who have died during the
needlessly long struggle. ~ All will have given
in vain. ~ We, and they, are being s#!% on by
New York State. ~ Have we wasted all our time,
effort and money believing our needs were
answered? ~ We have been diverted away from
pursuing other avenues of funding for these past
two years plus. ~ We now face the loss of our
ship. ~ All the money, services, material and
labor that was lovingly contributed by many
businesses in W.N.Y. as well as individuals who
gave, some more than they could afford, to reach
this point, is to be ignored?
The State wants to take this money from the
Canadiana to give it to projects that were
unable to rate in the first place. ~ It will go
to those which had so little merit they were
soundly defeated after three I.S.T.E.A. rounds.
~ The point is; the D. O. T. is not making
better use of the money; they just want to
take it away for very suspect reasons. ~ They
are working against Western New York. ~
Tell them to give you clear answers as to how
any why. ~ Make them point to something
real; if they can. ~ Or; give it up!
They are stealing the federal
transportation money that the Canadiana brought
into this area. ~ They are taking away whatever
benefit it could have provided for everyone here
and they are preventing our goal of preserving
for posterity, this beautiful and very
worthwhile artifact of a much better time.
You must stop them. ~ If not, everyone will
lose. ~ The city is dying but no one tries to
reverse the process. ~ People crowding the
sidewalks make the city; not self contained
"arenas" that suburbanites visit. ~ Everyone who
lives here will suffer for the mistakes that are
being made now. ~ Everyone will remember. ~ We
will do our best to help them do so. ~ Read the
"History of the Canadiana". ~ Our book is being
put on the Internet in stages. ~ It will
continue to grow for perhaps a year when we will
print the hard copy version. ~ The chapters are
being uploaded and the pictures are being
scanned. ~ The final chapter is being written
now, as it is being played out. ~ Please do your
best to be a part of its happy ending.
Yours truly;
Floyd Baker
President;
The S. S. Canadiana Preservation Society, Inc.